The Doctor’s Got The Cure

WaPo has balanced, informative, and relevant article about the fight between the DCCC and the DNC over how to spend the DNC’s money. (I can only imagine how the article would have turned out if the byline had read VanDeHei.) From my quite biased perspective: Rahm, you’ve got your own committee. If you want to spend money in a certain way, raise it. Send out a letter or an email, or call up supporters, let them know how your committee is rightfully focused on short-term gains (in contrast to the DNC’s long-term interests) and see how much money you collect. Stop being jealous of Dean’s and Schumer’s abilities, and start typing those emails to your small-dollar contributors (since your big donors have hopefully maxed out).
The fight between Dean and Emanuel is emblematic of why so many Democrats lined up behind Dean during the primary (and, Washington insiders take note, this has nothing to do with the Iraq War). As DNC Chair, Dean will be judged primarily by the results of one night: November 7, 2006. When we elect (or fail to elect) a Democrat as President in 2008, the credit (or blame) for that campaign will fall on the candidate and his/her staff, not the DNC chair. If Dean only cared about his legacy, and not the future of the Democratic party, he’d spend money exactly how Emanuel recommends–to maximize midterm election gains. The groundwork that Dean is currently laying will payoff in the future and when that time comes, Dean’s successors will be showered with praise. We saw this sacrificial spirit and gumption early in the 2003 primary — it’s why Dean would have made a good President, but is making an even better party chair.
Moving from substance to process, Edsall (similarly to VanDeHei) continues to violate WaPo’s policy on unnamed sources. In this article alone, he references “Many Washington Democrats”, “one Democratic operative”, and “another [Democratic operative].” Hey, Tom and Jim, next time you’re writing an article, please give me a call. I no longer fit that first description, as I’ve moved to NJ, but I think we could go with “Democratic operative” as a label for my “expert” opinion. Hey, for all we know about your sources, the extent of their resumes is interning on the Joe Lieberman for President campaign.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

What do you do with a PhD?

In the past three days, I ran across two parodies by people with “Dr” in front of their names. Given the coincidence and the quality of the humor, I felt the need to post.
First up, a great video called “Every Change of Rate”, about how Dean Glenn Hubbard wanted that Fed Chair post, which Bush gave to Bernake.
Next, we have the Amateur Transplants, a London-based duo who rant about the the Tube and NHS. HT to Samidh for first introducing me to the group. (Warning: contains strong and sexist language.)
Enjoy both!
QOTD: “Some things are just never meant to be, no matter how much we wish they were.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Vote For Seth!

Former fellow 2E’ers really needs help on this NY Post poll, as he’s badly losing the “who should Christina date” race to someone who describes himself as “decent-looking, financially secure, humble but confident and respectful” — i.e., Seth’s polar opposite.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Behold: the Princeton Undergrad

I was invited to house parties at the eating clubs this past weekend. Most of you (like myself two weeks ago) have no idea what that means so I’ll sum up: 25 hours of partying in a 49-hour window. A formal on Friday night, a semi-formal on Saturday night, and a lawn party Sunday afternoon. Yeah, these Princeton kiddies are excited that their term is over. And here I was, attempting to show that a teetotaling grad student can have just as much fun.
Thus my adventure began Friday evening. I rented a tux for the first time since my HS prom and went for a bit of pink, which I believe I pulled off well. (You can judge for yourselves here.) Picked up my date at her dorm, and as luck would have it, the corsage I picked out and the boutonniere she picked out matched perfectly. After a bit of a struggle to get the boutonniere upright and stable, off we went to Quad, her eating club.
A quick aside about eating clubs, all of which are large houses on Prospect St. Undergrads join them in the middle of their sophomore year, and they function as FSILGs do on other campuses (though Princeton has a few F/S’s as well). The main difference is that only the eating club’s officers live on the premises–everyone else lives in dorms and just uses the clubs for meals and parties. Five of the clubs are “sign in”, meaning anyone who wants to join, can. The other five are “bicker” — the current club members must approve of the next crop of students. Ivy is considered the most prestigious (see downpost for a mini-rant). Quad, our base of operations last weekend, is a sign in.
Dinner on Friday night was a sit-down, be served by the club staff style, with a movie star theme. They had a vegetarian option (yay) and the portobello mushroom was excellent. To be honest, I can’t remember what dessert was…guess it couldn’t have been that good. After the meal, we went across the street to Colonial (another sign-in) and because they had started an hour after Quad, people were still eating. Suzanne knew several people in Colonial, so we hung there for a while. We ventured back to Quad to watch the end-of-year slide show and start what would become five and a half hours of dancing.
The band at Quad was only mediocre, but the dance floor was filled anyway. There was some drunkenness (especially notable were this group of five girls who were completely trashed and would rope in any free guy the second his date needed to go to bathroom — and I speak from experience). The music stopped at 1am, at which point we cross the street (or, as the say here, The Street) again to see what Colonial had to offer. Their band was great, had tons of energy, and had the crowd jumping. So we stayed their until a bit after 2:30, at which point it was time to head home.
And on Saturday, we did it all over again, this time with only half the formal. When I arrived at the dorm, we decided to wait for the whole crew to be ready (many of Suzanne’s hallmates were member of Quad as well). I suggested those of us who were ready to entertain ourselves by listening to “Wait Wait, Don’t Tell Me” (the NPR news quiz). Twas funny as always, and everyone learned who Stephen Colbert is. (And I thought the MIT bubble was bad.) Interestingly, Wait Wait was in DC this week, giving me hope that they actually do travel from Chicago occasionally, and the perhaps later in life I’ll get to attend a recording.
With the group assembled, we walked across campus to Quad, where a buffer-style dinner was waiting for us. The works were laid out: stir fry, salad, pasta, steak, lobster, shrimp, cheese and crackers, etc; the theme was “Paris Hilton’s Malibou Beach Party.” What an honor to be invited! <⁄sarcasm> We hopped around several clubs that evening. Colonial was mostly dead. For Tower (a bicker) we had to pretend we were other people to get in the door (they were checking a list), but the party was pretty lame inside anyway. Quad seemed like the best option that night, at least until the music (a DJ this time) wrapped at 1am again. By then, Ivy has stopped checking names on their list, and I was curious to see what all the hullabaloo was all about. I must say, Ivy threw a pretty rockin’ party — we left at 2:15, and the dancing was still going strong. Not too many public displays of drunkenness on Saturday either, though we saw our friend Spikey get “McCoshed.”
On Sunday, brunch started at 11am, but whoever could pull themselves out of bed, get ready, and walk over there by that time in the morning, clearly did not have enough fun on either of the two previous nights. In the mid-afternoon, we traversed The Street looking for good bands, and ventured into Cottage (a bicker). Now here, the alcohol was flowing like water. People were dancing with pitchers of beer in their hands. Beer was being poured from the second story balcony into someones mouth on the ground level. …. Yeah, I wouldn’t have been caught dead at a party like this under normal circumstances, but I guess I was expanding my horizons (?). In any, that excuse didn’t hold up very long, and we vacated the premises after about 20 minutes of debauchery observation. Quad was playing host to the USG-sponsored band, Rooney, later in the afternoon, so we wrapped up the weekend’s festivities by listening to them.
Of the entire three-part celebration, only two moments got me frustrated with the Princeton undergrad culture (not counting the minor ridiculousness of items such as popped collars and sweaters tied around long-sleeve, button-down shirts in 77-degree weather.) First, on Saturday, we were waiting in line for the open bar, and I hear people complaining about grade deflation. Specifically, the quote was, “Everyone who doesn’t get an A should write to Dean Slaughter [to complain].” I’m sorry: here you are, being served alcohol for free, without anyone checking your ID, on the grounds of a beautiful house on a college campus, which is (ostensibly) a learning institution, and you complain that you’ll have to actually work hard for your precious A?!?! Suck it up, please.
The second episode of frustration occurred on Sunday, when we told people we had been to Ivy the previous evening. The impressed reaction we received from people was quite disturbing. It’s unclear how being selective in the process of choosing members makes Ivy members better or worthy of admiration. The whole culture of prestige and entitlement on this campus (especially as it relates to The Street) is disconcerting and eye-opening at the same time. A word to the undergrads: judging people by their club membership seems to be an unfortunate way to go through life, or even four years of undergrad.
Those incidents aside, the weekend was a great bookend to my first academic year here. I’ll be staying at Princeton this summer to work on research, and hopefully develop a dissertation topic. Though I do have one more paper to write, so I can’t close the book on this term just quite yet.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What Got Into Mike?

Last week, I emerged from my position huddled over my glowing computer, as I turned in my paper on Friday and gave my presentation last Wednesday. The (45-minute) presentation and the inquisition afterward went pretty well. In fact, one of the top profs said it went “splendidly” — so I take that as a good sign :) Feel free to peruse either document. (I’m also glad that I’ve learned how to use Beamer, the LaTeX-based software I used to create the presentation, as I’m confident the skill will come in very handy throughout my grad school years.)
Each of the intervening weekends were exciting. During the penultimate April weekend, I traveled with old Beast pals to Boston for Yamini and Nicky’s wedding! The ceremony was my first of the (South) Indian variety. Unfortunately, the odd mix of Indian participatory culture and Western-style passive observers didn’t work so well for the ceremony. Basically, people were straining to see the seated (on the floor) wedding party as they said the Indian prayers. Apparently, in Indian, the guest are not in rows of chairs, but rather mill about in a circle around the Bride and Groom, and throw rice when appropriate. No matter, everyone gets a second chance when Amitha and James get married in a month :)
The reception, held in the Hampshire House, directly above the “Cheers” bar, was a lot of fun: tons of dancing, which was especially surprising given the amount of former MITers in attendance. After dinner/dancing, all of us young’ns searched for a bar to chat in. We tried “Cheers,” but it was packed…after much walking, we found a nice place in the Copley area. Alas, by then it was almost time for Seth and I to head back to the NY/NJ area.
Last weekend, I headed South, rather than North, to my old stomping grounds of DC to see friends and attend the Darfur rally. Saturday: lunch with the ‘rents at Eastern Market, a nice walk with Jen (who unfortunately will be moving to the left coast soon), and frisbee with Taren and Katie before the DC United game! We were playing FC Dallas, our counterparts at the top of the table in the Western division. The level of soccer was quite high for an MLS game, and in the end, despite several second-half chances for DC, the teams drew 1-1. Not a bad result.
Sunday, we rallied for Darfur! I estimated the event drew about 100,000 people to the mall, but apparently more-reliable estimates were 75,000. Still a good turnout. Lots and lots of Jews…I don’t think I’ve ever seen that many Yamachas outside of NYC or Israel. Our rallying cries was “Never Again” and “Not on our watch”. The speaker highlights were: Obama, Clooney’s father, Sharpton, and a survivor from the Bosnian genocide. As peace negotiations continue, we’re hopeful for a better-late-than-never cease fire. Unfortunately, apart from standing up and being counted, most of what we can do consists of watching and waiting.
My former boss, and Congressman, Mike Capuano also spoke. He gave a decent speech, and I was glad to see him at the forefront of this issue. But then I was reading about lobbying reform on DailyKos, and saw that Capuano was only one of four Democrats to cross party lines and vote against Rep Slaughter’s motion to recommit. WTF is a liberal Democrat doing crossing party lines on this issue?! I put a phone call into his office this morning and his legislative point-person on lobbying “reform” is supposed to get back to me. I’ll report whatever I find out.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Three Seders and A Funeral

I’ll be locked in my room the next day and a half working on my seminar paper, so I figured I’d pop up for air one last time before I submerge myself in ecological inference to tell you all about my Seders. (Only one more day of matza, yay!)
For the first night of Passover, since my parents live too far away, I had to look elsewhere for a Seder. Thankfully, fellow ex-MITers Naomi and Leah had invited me to their Seder in Long Island back in January. It turned out that their cousins (who live in Great Neck) were actually hosting this year, and they graciously welcomed me into their huge, gorgeous home. As the host family’s observance is on the orthodox end of conservative Judaism, the Seder was all in Hebrew, meaning my Hebrew site-reading skills were put to the test. This choice of language also meant that the Seder was loooong; thankfully, Leah left at 11:20, giving me the excuse to leave with her…otherwise we would have been their past midnight.
So I took the train back to Princeton that night, giving me plenty of time to prepare for the 2nd night Seder that I was hosting. There was the normal two-hours-before panicking (or, at least as close to panicking as I ever get), but with the help of a few punctual guests, we started off the Seder pretty much on time and with everything in order (pun slightly intended). Huge props to Chicklet who put together a fabulous Hagaddah — with a beautiful layout. We did everything in English, and the 20 (!) people who showed (especially the non-Jews) seemed to really enjoy it. (Luckily we reserved the community room so all those people did not have to fit into our apartment.) Even the kids from across the hall were heavily involved, reading long words such as “dialectical” and “globalization.” And we gave the boys fun dinosaur packs for finding the Afikomen so quickly! The dinner was over before we knew it (6:45pm – 9:15pm for the entire event) — a good way to introduce people to Jewish culture without boring them. All in all, a fantastic success. As they say, “Next year in the New Lawrence community room!”
Friday, Kosuke (the prof whom I work with) and I presented our paper at the NYU methodological conference. The presentation went well and the comments from the audience gave me a sneak peak about what will be asked a week from today when I present. My biggest gripe about the conference was the food! Here we were in the middle of NYC (Jew central) and they served nothing that was remotely kosher for Passover. For dinner, they were going to an Italian place! Well, in New York parlance, fahgetaboutit — I hung out with Diesel instead.
Diesel had just returned from Good Friday services (or Jesus’ funeral, as she called it), so she was ready for some debauchery. We bar-hopped: she knows some “shiny” places in NYC–one bar was completely unmarked on the outside, but inside it was packed with young hipsters smoking and swapping bohemian tales of their day in a bourgeois city. Then we went to her place to watch “The L word” :)
Saturday: another Seder! This time at Eva’s place, who had the Seder a few days late because that was when her parents could visit. The dinner was very pluralistic with everyone swapping tidbits of tradition and knowledge they had picked up over the years. I had learned the true story of the orange when prepping for my Seder, so I shared that tale with the group. Fun side note: I found the Afikomen in record time (before Eva’s father had even finished detailing the search boundaries).
But now I’m procrastinating writing my paper…I’ll be up very late tomorrow in case any of you insomniacs out there need someone to talk to at 4am.
Oh, and in more personal news, which you’ll have to ask me about off-blog, looks like I’ll finally be seeing the inside of a (nice) eating club.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

An Inconvenient Truth

Two people have mentioned to me Joe Klein’s article in this week’s Time entitled “Pssst! Who’s behind the decline of politics? [Consultants.]”, and I feel compelled to respond publically. He begins with a vignette of RFK’s speech during the night of King’s assassination:

“Ladies and gentlemen,” he began, rather formally, respectfully. “I’m only going to talk to you just for a minute or so this evening because I have some very sad news …” His voice caught, and he turned it into a slight cough, a throat clearing, “and that is that Martin Luther King was shot and was killed tonight in Memphis, Tennessee.”
…
“My favorite poem, my favorite poet was Aeschylus. He once wrote, ‘Even in our sleep, pain which cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart,'” he paused, his voice quivering slightly as he caressed every word. The silence had deepened, somehow; the moment was stunning. “‘Until … in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom through the awful grace of God.'”

Klein goes on to blame television and consultants for the lack of politicians who cite Aeschylus in their speeches. He then specifically attacks the consultants of the Gore and Kerry campaigns for causing their downfall. I agree with bits of the essay, but contend most of the substance.
First, I concur that television has changed everything. While previously, intellectuals could be elected to the highest office in the land, with the advent of mass communication, performers are much more suited to the task. (Roger Simon’s book Show Time illustrates this point quite clearly.)
I also 100% agree with this sentence:

In fact, [the Democratic consultants] had it backward: the character of their candidate, they believed, would be inferred from the quality of his policies.

If there was one thing that the Dean campaign taught us, it was that neck-down campaigns are exceedingly powerful. But in high-profile races at least, it is the candidate, not their consultants, who dictate whether you can run a head- or heart-centered campaign.
Klein then slips into the fallacy that I’ve seen all too often: because the Democrats lost in 2000 and 2004, the consultant on the left must be terrible, while Bush’s cadre must have the Midas touch. (Bush’s current approval rating notwithstanding, apparently.) The simple fact that a party loses two Presidential races in a row does not mean that party’s campaign structure is in shambles. Clinton won in 1992 and 1996, with much wider margins than Bush’s: where were the “Republicans have it all wrong” stories then?
But enough musings, let’s get down to facts. According to Ray Fair’s Presidential Vote Equation, which is based purely in the cards handed to the candidates (e.g., incumbency, economy), Gore should have won 50.8% of the two-party vote and Kerry should have won 42.3% of the vote. This equation has a standard error of a little more than 2%. (Non-statistician’s translation: most of the time the election will fall within 2% of the given number.)
How did the Democratic consultants do? Well, in 2000, Gore “only” received 50.3% of the two-party vote, well within the margin, but slightly underperforming the expected value. In 2004, Kerry received 48.7% of the two-party vote, demolishing the state-of-the-nation prediction. These numbers certainly don’t support Klein’s conclusion.
Plus, if Klein is going to blame the Democratic consultants, he should at least fault a specific action. For instance, in 2000, Bush stole West Virginia from Gore with television advertisements that blasted Gore’s environmental record. Gore’s polling showed him up by a good margin in WV, and thus his campaign didn’t respond to these ads for weeks. During that time, West Virginia went from Gore country to Bush country and then voted GOP in Novemberl for the first time since 1984 (since 1956 if we exlcude 49-state landslides). Ironically, Klein recommends that Gore should have spoken more about the environment. Yeah, and Gore should have touted his pledge to register all new handgun purchases, too…
Have Democrats made tactical mistakes? Sure. Kerry probably should have bashed Bush at his convention. Gore should have spent more resources in Tennessee. But, the Bush campaigns were not immune from stupid decisions either. In 2000, Bush’s consultants (who Klein specifically cite as a model for how campaigns should be run) decided to spend money on advertising in California. Recall that California media is almost prohibitively expensive and the Gore won the state with relative ease (53% to 42%). Gore’s advisors wisely stayed out of an ad war in CA, and Bush wasted $10.8 million. Think of how many gross rating points those dollars would have bought in the Orlando-Daytona Beach market.
Politics has changed since RFK’s time, and not necessarily for the better. Candidates have adapted to meet the public’s and the media’s shifting expectations. Consultants have learned to use new technology. But I’ll take a system of government, advisors and all, which produces Barack Obama as a convention keynote speaker any day.
LOTD: And while we’re on the subject of Al Gore: check out the trailer for his new documentary, An Inconvenient Truth.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Cannon Fodder

After a year of being down 6 to 1 on the Prank v Hack/Caltech v MIT scoreboard, the current breed of MITers successfully jumped ahead with the requisition of Caltech’s cannon. (My old dorm, EC, is in the background of the Globe’s pic.) A group of hackers traveled to Caltech in late March and procured the cannon by posing as a construction company with legitimate work orders. Turns out that Caltech fell for the same prank twice, albeit 20 years apart. More pics are here; my fav:




MIT showing its true colors: pasty white lab tan.
Update: Of course the first place Caltech looked was Harvey Mudd…

Subject: Caltech cannon
Date: 28 March 06 19:56:34 PST
To: [HMC internal mailing list]
Howdy,
Did anyone steal the Caltech cannon Monday night/Tuesday
morning? They called and said it was stolen and were hoping it was here.
Chris Sundberg
Associate Dean of Students
Harvey Mudd College

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Toliver Twist: Terps Win!

Fear the Turtle, baby: the Maryland Terrapins just won the Women’s NCAA basketball championship! A fade-away three-pointer by Kristi Toliver at the end of regulation sent the game to overtime, and Maryland played excellent defense on Duke’s final possession to stymie the Blue Devils. Looking back on my picks, I’m embarrassed to say that I had the MD women losing to UNC in the Semis. That lack of hometown faith helped sink my ESPN picks to the 30th percentile.
On the men’s side, I was disappointed by the lack of ACC representation in the Final Four. My ESPN bracket picks did excellently: 98th percentile and second place in the Politics Department’s pool. I can’t say the same for my family pool. I had great 5-team picks all set and ready to go (I was literally a few neurons firing from hitting the Send button), but I second-guessed myself and ended up much worse for the wear. (Even my father beat me this year!) The joke 5th-place prizes were:

A one way plane ticket to the southwest for a Quail shoot with Dick Cheney.
A tour of Bode Miler’s Olympic Medal room.
An all-expense paid half-day outing on the Minnesota Vikings Loveboat!

Can’t say I get the last one–guess I need to watch SportsCenter more.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Unity Government?

After watching last night’s episode of West Wing, I couldn’t help but think that there was no obvious choice for Santos’s new VP (assuming he wins). Thus, I’ll open it up to the floor: who do you think it will be?

If you think I missed someone, let me know.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment